I play another game that, ever week, you get taxed based on the number of horses you have that are "active". It's a horse racing game, so we get taxed a different amount based on our horses in our main barn who race vs. those in our breeding barn that can only breed. I *think* it goes based on a percentage of how much money you have.

The players that make their graphics have a starting bid of 50mill would have to agree to start lowering their prices. But there are still player sthat can still afford to pay these high prices because they themselves self graphic and cahrge that much. Its a cycle. 

No, to lower inflation money needs to come out of the economy. People will have less to spend, and THAT will make prices to down. People agreeing to sell things for less changes absolutely nothing. :/

^ Absolutely 100% agree with that, which is why it bothers me so much when people get mad at other people for not selling their stuff for less. Buyers will pay what they can afford to pay, and as more money is withdrawn from the economy, buyer's budgets are going to become lower on their own. Prices will adjust along the way.

What's also a little frustrating though is when people complain about the economy and inflation and how expensive graphics are, but then when people start to bid less, the designers get mad because they're not getting as much as they used to and start to take it personally. I like to bid lots on nice things as much as the next person, but at the moment I simply can't afford to. It's nothing against your skills as a designer, I just don't have the money to bid as much as your last one sold for.

Sorry guys but I personally don't see an issue with inflation especially when it comes to ticket prices...

They aren't needed to have great horses on the game.

I don't have much to add about the whole topic as I sick of repeating my views on it.

But I don't think it would be fair to tax the rich more than the poor.

Why should us richer players be punished for working hard for years??